Historically, humanity has utilized the built environment to control and reshape its surroundings, frequently treating natural elements like land, water, and ecosystems as mere resources for exploitation. However, there's a growing paradigm shift in architecture, moving away from resource extraction toward active collaboration with natural processes. This evolution necessitates that designers understand how structures and their components age, develop, deteriorate, and endure over extended periods. Such a perspective prompts the profession to critically evaluate its impact on the natural world and the diverse species within it, fostering interconnectedness among people, constructions, living organisms, and various ecosystems.
This publication delves into innovative architectural concepts that position buildings as dynamic, adaptable elements within shared environments, rather than isolated structures. Over the past month, editors have explored themes spanning vast geographical scales and even extraterrestrial realms. Their collective work highlights contemporary and future approaches to coexistence, categorized into three primary areas: material and biological interactions, urban ecological systems, and the creation of habitats that sustain human existence. A central inquiry guides these investigations: how can environments be crafted to support harmonious living among humans, other species, and natural forces?
Redefining Boundaries: Materiality and Multilayered Habitats
For centuries, the surfaces of human constructions inadvertently provided refuge for various non-human species. From birds nesting in structural fissures to insects inhabiting micro-cavities and mosses clinging to textured facades, these elements offered incidental habitats. Modern construction methods, emphasizing sealed insulation and strict climate control, systematically eliminated these spontaneous shelters. Nevertheless, emerging architectural approaches are now deliberately reintroducing these spatial opportunities, conceptualizing building envelopes as shared infrastructure that balances human protection with ecological capacity. This approach signifies a profound shift from a human-centric design philosophy to one that acknowledges and integrates the needs of diverse life forms.
This re-evaluation extends to domestic structures, such as animal enclosures and combined agricultural buildings, where architectural forms have historically adapted to local climates and materials to create functional, shared spaces for various species. When scaled up, even microscopic organisms like mold can redefine our understanding of building performance. Instead of solely being seen as structural flaws, mold acts as real-time, physical data, visually mapping failures in ventilation, thermal bridging, and moisture accumulation that traditional designs often overlook. This perspective prompts a deeper consideration of how buildings can harmoniously interact with biological processes, moving beyond rigid control towards a more dynamic and adaptive relationship with living systems.
Interconnected Urbanism: Designing for Multi-Species Coexistence
In urban settings, the convergence of ecological preservation and civic infrastructure is transforming conventional engineering paradigms. In Chile, organizations like Fundación Cosmos are employing landscape architecture to convert ecosystems into functional urban wetland parks. These designs, inspired by biomimicry and indigenous construction techniques, demonstrate how public spaces can simultaneously protect local biodiversity, manage regional water cycles, and offer environmental education to nearby communities. This illustrates a shift from purely human-oriented urban planning to a more inclusive approach that considers the needs of all inhabitants.
A similar dynamic exists in the dense urban centers of India and Southwest Asia, where traditional urban planning often viewed wild and domestic animals as public health concerns. However, millions of free-ranging animals—including dogs, monkeys, and birds—coexist with humans in streets, markets, and other public spaces. Over time, these animals have adapted their behaviors to human schedules, waste management systems, and urban layouts. Recognizing them as legitimate occupants requires architects to design transit networks, public plazas, and structural components that acknowledge and accommodate the overlapping patterns of both human and non-human life. This integrative approach fosters a truly multi-species city, where shared spaces enhance the well-being of all.
